FanDuel and DraftKings Lawsuit Dismissed Over Arbitration Agreement
Judge throws out sports betting case, saying the claims should be handled through arbitration

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed against FanDuel and DraftKings by two Philadelphia bettors who claimed the sportsbooks encouraged excessive gambling through targeted promotions, VIP programs and in app features.
The ruling means the case will not proceed in court after the judge found that the plaintiffs had agreed to arbitration clauses when creating their sportsbook accounts. As a result, any disputes must instead be resolved through private arbitration, making sure they are in line with the operators' terms and conditions.
Court Backs Arbitration Agreements
The lawsuit argued that FanDuel and DraftKings used personalised promotions, bonuses and engagement tools to encourage excessive gambling, leading to significant financial losses for the plaintiffs.
However, the court concluded that both customers had accepted the operators' user agreements, which require legal disputes to be settled through arbitration rather than in a public courtroom. The decision dismissed the case without addressing the underlying allegations surrounding the sportsbooks' marketing practices.
Ongoing Scrutiny of Sportsbooks
Although the lawsuit has been dismissed, FanDuel and DraftKings continue to face more legal and regulatory attention in the United States.
In recent months, both operators have been named in several lawsuits examining responsible gambling measures, marketing practices and the use of VIP programmes. Regulators and lawmakers have also continued to debate whether additional consumer protections are needed as online sports betting expands across the country.
Arbitration Becomes a Key Legal Hurdle
The decision shows the important role arbitration clauses continue to play in disputes involving online sportsbooks.
Many licensed betting operators include mandatory arbitration requirements in their terms of service, making it more difficult for customer claims to proceed as traditional court cases. While the Philadelphia lawsuit has come to an end, wider discussions around responsible gambling, consumer protection and sportsbook marketing practices are expected to continue.
Stay tuned to UMG Gaming for the latest news, analysis and updates from the world of prediction markets, sports betting and iGaming.
About the author
Ryan Cauchi
Ryan Cauchi is the Lead Journalist at UMG Gaming, where he covers the evolving landscape of legal sports betting, the growing social casino market, and legislative developments shaping the gaming industry.