Wisconsin Warns Voters Over Election Prediction Markets
State election officials say voters who bet on elections could face criminal penalties and lose their voting rights

The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) has issued a warning to voters, saying anyone who places a wager on an election through a prediction market and then votes in that same election could be breaking state law.
According to the commission, Wisconsin law prohibits voters from directly or indirectly betting on the outcome of an election in which they participate. Officials said those found to have done so could face administrative challenges to their voter eligibility, felony charges and also referrals to local prosecutors.
Commission Reminds Voters of State Law
The guidance comes as election prediction markets continue to gain attention across the United States, with platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket allowing users to trade contracts that are tied to political outcomes.
"We want voters to understand that they cannot legally make a bet on an election and cast a ballot in that same election," the commission said, adding that violations could result in both criminal and election related consequences.
Kalshi Pushes Back
Kalshi was quick to respond, where they said that Wisconsin's position targets individual users instead of addressing the more important legal questions surrounding federally regulated prediction markets.
The company said that if the state believes election contracts approved by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are unlawful, it should challenge the federal regulator rather than pursue action against voters. Kalshi also called on the commission to withdraw its guidance.
Another Twist in the Prediction Market Debate
The warning adds to a list of legal and regulatory developments surrounding prediction markets in the United States. In recent months, several states have challenged sports event contracts offered by prediction market operators, while lawmakers in Washington have also questioned how these products should be regulated. Election markets now appear to be drawing similar scrutiny as state officials examine how existing laws apply to this expanding sector.
Although the guidance is specific to Wisconsin, it highlights the continuing uncertainty surrounding prediction markets as state regulators, federal authorities and industry operators continue to debate where the boundaries should be drawn.
Stay tuned to UMG Gaming for the latest news, analysis and updates from the world of prediction markets, sports betting and iGaming.
About the author
Ryan Cauchi
Ryan Cauchi is the Lead Journalist at UMG Gaming, where he covers the evolving landscape of legal sports betting, the growing social casino market, and legislative developments shaping the gaming industry.