US Senate Hearing Puts Sports Betting Integrity Back Under Federal Spotlight
A new US Senate hearing placed sports betting integrity and prediction markets under federal scrutiny as lawmakers discussed regulation, oversight, and match-fixing concerns.

A US Senate subcommittee is once again turning its attention toward sports betting and prediction markets as lawmakers prepare to examine integrity concerns tied to the rapidly expanding gambling industry.
The Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Technology, and Data Privacy held a hearing titled “No Sure Bets: Protecting Sports Integrity in America” on May 20, with discussions centered around match manipulation, insider information, athlete harassment, and the growing presence of prediction markets tied to sports events.
The hearing arrives after months of increasing political pressure surrounding both regulated sportsbooks and federally regulated prediction market operators such as Kalshi and Polymarket. Several recent scandals involving professional and college sports betting investigations also helped push integrity concerns back into federal discussions.
Senators Target Match Manipulation And Prediction Markets
Senator Marsha Blackburn, who chaired the hearing, said lawmakers wanted to examine how betting growth could impact the credibility of professional and amateur sports. Senator Ted Cruz also referenced recent incidents that raised concerns over whether stronger oversight measures may be needed.
Witnesses included representatives from the American Gaming Association, integrity monitoring firms, state regulators, prediction market advocates, and gambling harm researchers.
Prediction markets remained one of the hearing’s biggest talking points.
Federal lawmakers have increasingly scrutinized sports event contracts offered through commodity exchanges, especially as state gaming regulators continue challenging whether the products function more like sportsbooks than financial trading markets. The topic has become even more politically sensitive following several state lawsuits and cease-and-desist actions targeting prediction market operators over the past few months.
That pressure has also started reaching Capitol Hill. Earlier this month, senators unanimously approved legislation preventing members of Congress and senior federal officials from participating in prediction markets tied to political events.
Read Also: Tennessee Officially Bans Sweepstakes Casinos After Governor Signs Bill
Federal Oversight Discussions Continue Expanding
The hearing itself does not create immediate federal gambling legislation, but it adds to growing momentum around possible national standards for sports betting oversight.
Several proposals discussed around the hearing included restrictions on college player prop bets, tighter advertising controls, stronger responsible gambling protections, and limits involving sports prediction contracts.
Congress has largely avoided direct federal sports betting regulation since the fall of PASPA in 2018, leaving states to build their own frameworks. But as the market continues growing alongside new gambling-adjacent products like prediction markets and sweepstakes casinos, lawmakers appear increasingly willing to revisit whether state-by-state regulation is enough.
The hearing also continues a broader trend of federal attention toward gaming policy throughout 2026, particularly as integrity concerns begin intersecting with financial regulation, consumer protection, and public health discussions.
Stay tuned to UMG Gaming for more updates on prediction markets, tribal gaming, and the evolving U.S. gaming landscape.
About the author
CJ
Christian Joseph “CJ” Zambale is a journalist and content specialist who covers the iGaming and esports industries.