New York Takes Kalshi to Court Over Prediction Markets
State alleges the platform is operating an unlicensed gambling business as the legal fight over prediction markets continues

Ryan Cauchi
Editor · August 3, 2026

New York has filed a lawsuit against Kalshi, accusing the prediction market operator of running an illegal gambling business without the licences required under state law.
The lawsuit, filed by Attorney General Letitia James and supported by Governor Kathy Hochul, claims Kalshi has been offering sports and event contracts to New York residents without approval from the New York State Gaming Commission. State officials are seeking to stop the company from operating in New York and are also pursuing financial penalties that could reach billions of dollars.
State Says Kalshi Is Breaking Gambling Laws
According to the lawsuit, New York argues that Kalshi's event contracts function like traditional gambling products and should be regulated under the state's gaming laws rather than federal commodities rules.
State officials also claim the platform has avoided licensing requirements and consumer protection measures that licensed sportsbooks and casinos must follow. They further argue that Kalshi allows users aged 18 to 20 to access its platform, while New York requires customers to be at least 21 to place legal online sports bets.
Kalshi Defends Its Position
Kalshi has rejected the allegations, maintaining that it operates as a federally regulated exchange under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
The company argues that its event contracts are financial products governed by the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), meaning federal law takes precedence over state gambling regulations. Kalshi has also moved to transfer the case to federal court, continuing the legal strategy it has used in similar cases across the country.
Another Major Test for Prediction Markets
The New York lawsuit is the latest in a series of legal challenges facing prediction market operators.
Over the past year, states including Washington, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nevada and Wisconsin have all taken action against Kalshi, arguing that its sports event contracts should be treated as gambling under state law. At the same time, the CFTC has continued to defend its authority over federally regulated prediction markets, setting up an ongoing clash between state and federal regulators.
Legal Battle Shows No Signs of Slowing
The outcome of the New York case could have significant implications for the future of prediction markets in the United States.
With more states challenging Kalshi's business model and federal regulators standing by their oversight, the courts are likely to play a key role in determining how event contracts are regulated going forward.
Stay tuned to UMG Gaming for the latest news, analysis and updates from the world of prediction markets, sports betting and iGaming.